On May 13, 2016 Sejm, the lower chamber of the Polish Parliament, passed amendments to the 1997 Tax Code, introducing the General Anti-Avoidance Clause (‘‘GAAR’’). The relevant provisions shall enter into force on July 15, 2016. The most important provision of the GAAR, the newly-added Article 119a of the Tax Code, stipulates that ‘‘a transaction performed mainly for the purpose of obtaining a tax beneﬁt, in given circumstances contradicting the object and purpose of the tax law, shall not result in a tax beneﬁt, if the manner of actions [of the taxpayer] was artiﬁcial (tax avoidance).’’ It states further that ‘‘in the situation deﬁned above, the tax consequences of actions [of the taxpayer] shall be determined based upon such factual status, which could have taken place, if the appropriate action had been performed,’’ clarifying that ‘‘the action shall be deemed appropriate if it could have been performed [by the taxpayer] in given circumstances, had [the taxpayer] acted reasonably, guided by the law-compliant goals other than obtaining a tax beneﬁt, contradicting the object and purpose of the tax law’’. The GAAR provides further that if the circumstances indicate that obtaining a tax beneﬁt was the only purpose of given action [of the taxpayer], the tax consequences of such action shall be determined based upon such factual status, which could have taken place, if the given action had not been performed.
The initial draft outlining of the planned GAAR had already been already announced in 2013, but the new provisions amending the 1997 Tax Code were passed on May 15, 2016. It is worth mentioning that the ﬁrst version of GAAR was passed as far back as 14 years ago, but in 2005 the Polish Constitutional Tribunal repealed the GAAR provisions as being too vague and imprecise.
In cases where the double tax treaties concluded by Poland contain clauses aimed against tax avoidance, referring to tax beneﬁts being the main or one of the main purposes of performing certain transactions or establishing a structure or referring to obtaining of an income in connection with an artiﬁcial structure, the above GAAR provision shall apply accordingly. The action manner shall be deemed artiﬁcial if, based upon existing circumstances, one should assume that it would not have been applied by a person acting reasonably and guided by the law-compliant goals other than obtaining a tax beneﬁt, contradicting the object and purpose of the tax law.
There are certain exceptions from the GAAR, including, among others, transactions resulting in a tax beneﬁt not exceeding 100,000 zlotys (approx. 23,000 euros) or cases in which a special ruling has been obtained by the taxpayer from the newly-created body called ‘‘Council for Counteracting of Tax Avoidance.’’ Application for such a special ruling ‘‘securing’’ the position of the taxpayer vis-a`-vis the tax authorities is subject to a relatively high administrative fee of 20,000 zlotys (approx. 4,600 euros).
The new GAAR rules shall apply to tax beneﬁts obtained after the date of entry into force of the amendments to the Tax Code, i.e. to tax beneﬁts obtained after July 15, 2016. As a result of such principle, in fact, the GAAR rules may apply to transactions performed or tax-optimization structures established before that date, if the actual tax beneﬁts were to obtained after July 15, 2016.
Another important change applies to the rules regarding the standard tax rulings issued by the Minister of Finance. The new Article 14n of the Tax Code stipulates that the tax ruling shall not be issued with respect to such elements of the factual status or future situation, which raise justiﬁed assumptions that they might be subject to decisions based upon Article 119a (i.e. GAAR) or constitute an abuse of law, referred to in Article 5.5 of the 2004 VAT Law.
Mogą Cię zainteresować
Fundusze private equity a prawo antymonopolowe – co za zakrętem?
Nie ma wątpliwości, że ojczyzną prawa antymonopolowego są Stany Zjednoczone, ale dający się tam zaobserwować zwrot jest po części pochodną zjawisk politycznych i gospoda...
Czy pobieżne zapoznanie się z pismem przez Przeszukujących rzeczywiście zagraża tajemnicy zawodowej pełnomocników?
Ostatnia nowelizacja ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów (Ustawa) z dnia 9 marca br., mająca na celu wdrożenie dyrektywy ECN+, wzbudza ostatnio sporo obaw. Dzisi...